Only warfarin has been shown to reduce stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation
- John G F Cleland, foundation chair in cardiology,
- Gerry C Kaye, consultant cardiologist
- School of Medicine, Academic Department of Cardiology, University of Hull, Hull HU16 5JQ
- Department of Primary Care and General Practice, Division of Primary Care, Public and Occupational Health, University of Birmingham B15 2TT
- University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK
- Department of Primary Care and General Practice, Division of Primary Care, Public and Occupational Health, University of Birmingham B15 2TT
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Science, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-26, Hobart, Australia 7001
- Medical Department, Pharmacia, 20152 Milan, Italy
- Herlev University Hospital, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
- Bispebjeg University Hospital, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Division of Neurological Rehabilitation, Hvidovre University Hospital, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
- Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, London SE5 9PJ
- Bushey Health Centre, Bushey, Hertfordshire WD23 2NN
- Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW
- Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals, London WC1E 6DB
- Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2HU
EDITOR—The conclusions of Taylor et al about the use of aspirin for atrial fibrillation are misleading and potentially dangerous for clinical practice.1
Firstly, when considering anticoagulation or aspirin for the management of heart failure it is appropriate first to compare each against placebo. Overall, aspirin has no effect compared with placebo in preventing thromboembolic events or death among patients with atrial fibrillation, whereas warfarin exerts a significant reduction in both outcomes compared with placebo.2
Secondly, Taylor et al excluded a key study, stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF) III, from their analysis.3 This study showed that full dose warfarin versus low dose warfarin combined with aspirin exerted a significantly greater reduction in stroke (1.7% v 5.6%; P=0.0007) with a trend to reduced total mortality (5.9% v 7.2%).3
Thirdly, the BMJ has previously published the mortality data from the aspirin (28 deaths) and placebo (30 deaths) arms of the AFASAK study, allowing mortality in the warfarin arm (13 deaths) to be calculated.4 Thus, the all cause mortality data from AFASAK is available contrary to the assertions of Taylor et al. Only warfarin has been shown to reduce the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation, and only warfarin seems to reduce mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation. If the risk associated with atrial fibrillation is considered low enough to warrant treatment with aspirin then there is insufficient evidence to recommend any antithrombotic treatment at all.
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None declared.
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
Inclusion criteria determine results of review
- Jonathan Mant, senior lecturer,
- David Fitzmaurice, senior lecturer,
- Ellen Murray, research fellow,
- Gregory Y H Lip, reader in medicine,
- F D Richard Hobbs, professor
- School of Medicine, Academic Department of Cardiology, University of Hull, Hull HU16 5JQ
- Department of Primary Care and General Practice, Division of Primary Care, Public and Occupational Health, University of Birmingham B15 2TT
- University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK
- Department of Primary Care and General Practice, Division of Primary Care, Public and Occupational Health, University of Birmingham B15 2TT
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Science, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-26, Hobart, Australia 7001
- Medical Department, Pharmacia, 20152 Milan, Italy
- Herlev University Hospital, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
- Bispebjeg University Hospital, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Division of Neurological Rehabilitation, Hvidovre University Hospital, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
- Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, London SE5 9PJ
- Bushey Health Centre, Bushey, Hertfordshire WD23 2NN
- Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW
- Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals, London WC1E 6DB
- Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2HU
EDITOR—We agree with Taylor et al that questions remain unanswered over the relative benefits of anticoagulation and antiplatelet treatment for non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation.1 Uncertainty remains over the optimum treatment of elderly patients, who were underrepresented in the anticoagulation trials, and in whom pathophysiological reasons and empirical evidence suggest higher risk of haemorrhage on warfarin.2 There is …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27