Letters

Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism

BMJ 2001; 323 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7305.163 (Published 21 July 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;323:163

Ecological studies cannot answer main question

  1. Liam Smeeth (liam.smeeth@lshtm.ac.uk), clinical research fellow, department of epidemiology and population health,
  2. Andrew J Hall, head, infectious disease epidemiology unit,
  3. Laura C Rodrigues, reader in epidemiology, department of infectious and tropical diseases,
  4. Xiangning Huang, research fellow, department of infectious and tropical diseases,
  5. Peter G Smith, head, department of infectious and tropical diseases,
  6. Eric Fombonne, reader in epidemiological child psychiatry
  1. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT
  2. Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical Research Council Child Psychiatry Unit, London SE5 8AF
  3. Mount-Sinai Hospital, 5690 Cavendish, Cote-St-Luc, Montreal, Province of Quebec, Canada H4W 1S7
  4. Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Ross 4.06, Royal Victoria Hospital, 687 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Province of Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1
  5. TL Autism Research, 70 Viewcrest Drive, Falmouth, MA 02540, USA
  6. Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program, Boston University School of Medicine, 11 Muzzey Street, Lexington, MA 02421, USA

    EDITOR—Kaye et al undertook an ecological study comparing the time trend in measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine coverage with the time trend in diagnoses of autism.1 They found a marked increase in the incidence of codes for autism in children's electronic general practice records over 11 years.

    We agree with their conclusion that MMR cannot be the cause of this observed increase since the vaccine coverage remained constant over the same time. There have been changes in the classification of autistic diseases and in the likelihood of case ascertainment in recent years, and a more rigorous review of cases may clarify whether some of the increase was due to alterations in diagnostic practice.2 Only 81% of cases were reported to have been referred to a specialist, raising questions about the validity of the diagnoses used by Kaye et al. Children with medical conditions present from birth and known to be associated with an increased risk of autism (fragile X disorder, tuberous sclerosis, phenylketonuria, and congenital rubella) were not excluded.

    The failure to find an association between the time trends in vaccine coverage and the incidence of autism codes in children's electronic general practice records does not exclude a causal association. Whether exposure to MMR vaccination increases the risk of autism is of great public health importance and can be usefully investigated using the general practice research database. We have been funded by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council to undertake an investigation of the causes of autism, including an assessment of the potential role of MMR vaccine using case-control and case series approaches. The electronic general practice records in the database will be supplemented by a full record review of all cases and, subject to ethical approval, questionnaires to parents of both affected children …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe