Editorials

A better oral rehydration solution?

BMJ 2001; 323 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7304.59 (Published 14 July 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;323:59

An important step, but not a leap forward

  1. George J Fuchs (gjfuchs@usa.net), professor of paediatrics
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA

    Papers p 81

    Diarrhoea remains one of the leading causes of death in children below 5 years of age in developing countries, resulting in over 4 million deaths a year. Most diarrhoeal deaths are caused by dehydration, which can be treated by replacing fluid loss with oral rehydration solution in over 90% of cases. For over 20 years the World Health Organization and Unicef have recommended an oral rehydration solution containing 90 mmol/l of sodium and 111 mmol/l of glucose. 1 2 This solution is of established efficacy in treating children and adults with diarrhoea regardless of its cause. Despite proved efficacy, the acceptance of oral rehydration solution by patients worldwide and particularly outside facility-based treatment centres has been less than optimal and even poor. As a result, other formulations have been developed and tested, and this week's issue carries a meta-analysis of studies comparing the standard WHO oral rehydration solution with reduced osmolarity solutions (p 81).3

    One of the major constraints of the WHO oral rehydration solution is that it does not visibly reduce the severity of diarrhoea (volume of stool and duration of diarrhoea), which is often …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe