- Bobbie Farsides, senior lecturer, medical ethics (bobbie.farsides@kcl.ac.uk)a,
- Robert J Dunlop, honorary senior lecturerb
- a Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS
- b Guy's, King's College, and St Thomas's Hospitals School of Medicine and Dentistry, London SE5 9PJ
- Correspondence to: B Farsides
This is the last in a series of five articles
Measuring quality of life has an important place in health care, but what about when life has no quality? Or worse? From an ethical perspective there are two areas in which these issues have been extensively explored: termination of pregnancy and end of life decision making for competent and non-competent adults. One way in which quality of life is sometimes introduced to decision making is through the concept of “a life not worth living.” The seemingly logical conclusion is that lives not worth living may not be worth creating or saving. This final paper in the series debates the problems—both the practical difficulties of measurement and ethical issues—associated with measuring quality of life in situations in which lives have been judged to have no quality.
Summary points
There are no quality of life measures that reliably identify patients who feel that life is not worth living
Basing management decisions on such measures requires extreme caution because of the fluctuating nature of patients' valuations of life and their desire for death
Patients who are dying may find some quality in life, even when their quality of life as assessed by current measures is abysmal
The use of proxies to determine whether a life is worth living is problematic because of the possible disparity between an observer's assessment and the patient's own valuation
Both patients and their proxies have identified health states that they consider to be worse than death
The beginning and the end
If a pregnancy is terminated because the fetus has an abnormality we will never know for sure whether the life in question would have been worth living. However, we allow lives to be terminated if they are predicted to be of low (or maybe only slightly diminished) quality. We base these decisions not only, …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012