- Bobbie Farsides, senior lecturer, medical ethics (bobbie.farsides@kcl.ac.uk)a,
- Robert J Dunlop, honorary senior lecturerb
- a Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS
- b Guy's, King's College, and St Thomas's Hospitals School of Medicine and Dentistry, London SE5 9PJ
- Correspondence to: B Farsides
This is the last in a series of five articles
Measuring quality of life has an important place in health care, but what about when life has no quality? Or worse? From an ethical perspective there are two areas in which these issues have been extensively explored: termination of pregnancy and end of life decision making for competent and non-competent adults. One way in which quality of life is sometimes introduced to decision making is through the concept of “a life not worth living.” The seemingly logical conclusion is that lives not worth living may not be worth creating or saving. This final paper in the series debates the problems—both the practical difficulties of measurement and ethical issues—associated with measuring quality of life in situations in which lives have been judged to have no quality.
Summary points
There are no quality of life measures that reliably identify patients who feel that life is not worth living
Basing management decisions on such measures requires extreme caution because of the fluctuating nature of patients' valuations of life and their desire for death
Patients who are dying may find some quality in life, even when their quality of life as assessed by current measures is abysmal
The use of proxies to determine whether a life is worth living is problematic because of the possible disparity between an observer's assessment and the patient's own valuation
Both patients and their proxies have identified health states that they consider to be worse than death
The beginning and the end
If a pregnancy is terminated because the fetus has an abnormality we will never know for sure whether the life in question would have been worth living. However, we allow lives to be terminated if they are predicted to be of low (or maybe only slightly diminished) quality. We base these decisions not only, …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27