More information is needed to be able to interpret study's results
- L Y Chan, medical officer (lyschan@netvigator.com),
- P M Yuen, consultant
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
- National Institute of Occupational Health, PO Box 8149 Dep, N-0033 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medicine, Odder Hospital, DK-830 Odder, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medicine V, Aalborg and Aarhus University Hospitals, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology M, Aalborg Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
- Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, DK-8000 Aarhus C
EDITOR—Nielsen et al found that the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in early pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of miscarriage but not with congenital abnormality, low birth weight, or preterm delivery.1 Unfortunately, the study has several deficiencies that make interpretation of the results difficult.
Firstly, the study was based on the Danish birth registry and the prescription database; the clinical information available was limited, and a random sample confirmed the prescription in only 71% of the pregnancies. Although the authors state that the data had high validity, Kristensen et al reported that the birth registry under-reported the incidence of preterm delivery by over 50%.2
Secondly, in assessing the risk of miscarriage the authors stratified the study group according to the time between the prescription of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the date of discharge from hospital after miscarriage. How the control group was stratified is not clear. Without this information, any conclusion about the association between exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and miscarriage cannot be substantiated.
Thirdly, to establish the association between exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012