Data do not support claimed benefit of combination over single treatment
- James McCormack (jmccorma@interchange.ubc.ca), associate professor,
- Marc Levine, professor
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1W5
- Department of Medicine, M, Kommunehospitalet, University Hospital, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
EDITOR—Mogensen et al interpret their results as showing that the combination of lisinopril plus candesartan was more effective than either agent alone at lowering blood pressure and reducing the urinary albumin:creatinine ratio over 24 weeks in patients with type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetes.1 They state, “our results … support this new and potentially highly beneficial therapeutic approach for the prevention of diabetic renal and vascular disease.”
The authors' interpretation of the renoprotective effect of the combination and its superiority in lowering blood pressure does not seem to be supported by the results. Several methodological issues in particular limit their interpretation.
Firstly, the authors state in the abstract that “the reduction in urinary albumin:creatinine ratio with combination treatment … was greater than with either candesartan … or lisinopril.” Table 4, however, shows that the difference …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27