The conundrum of Barrett's oesophagus is changing
- J A Eksteen (B.Eksteen@bham.ac.uk), lecturer in gastroenterology,
- Janusz A Jankowski, reader in medicine
- University of Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH
- Academic Unit of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
- Pathology Laboratory, South Warwickshire NHS Trust, Warwick CV34 5BJ
- James Paget Hospital, Great Yarmouth NR31 6LA
- Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN
- Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW
EDITOR—Macdonald et al in their paper and McGarrity in his accompanying editorial reviewed the value of endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus. 1 2 Both articles highlighted the major problems with detection of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in an unselected group of individuals with Barrett's oesophagus.
Much attention has been devoted to risk stratification of individuals who are at high risk of malignant change in Barrett's oesophagus. Men over 45 years, those with at least 3 cm of Barrett's metaplasia, those with severe and frequent reflux symptoms (>3 times week), those with chronic heartburn for 10 years or more, obese patients, those taking drugs which relax the lower oesophageal sphincter (such as nitrates), and perhaps those with eradicated Helicobacter pylori infection are most at risk of Barrett's associated adenocarcinoma.3
Pathology has also made a major contribution to understanding the pathogenesis as intestinal type metaplasia gives rise to dysplastic clones from which the adenocarcinoma arises.3 Molecular genetics has been rigorously applied to samples along the sequence encompassing Barrett's metaplasia, dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma, and it has yielded important information about key genetic alterations.4 Furthermore, information of those with a family history of gastro-oesophageal cancer has also yielded rare, but none the less important, genetic defects, which can and should be considered for application to familial clusters of disease including germ line mutations of the cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin.5
We believe therefore that even in those patients with Barrett's oesophagus who are fit for surgery further selection for repeated endoscopic surveillance should be undertaken. In particular, a combination of clinical criteria, and, perhaps in the near future, genetics, can be used to stratify for surveillance those at high risk of Barrett's adenocarcinoma.
It is too early to dismiss surveillance programmes
- Christopher Paul Wild (c.p.wild@leeds.ac.uk), professor of molecular epidemiology,
- David Forman, professor of cancer epidemiology
- University of Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH
- Academic Unit of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
- Pathology Laboratory, South Warwickshire NHS Trust, Warwick CV34 5BJ
- James Paget Hospital, Great Yarmouth NR31 6LA
- Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN
- Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW
EDITOR—Macdonald et al conclude that current surveillance strategies for patients with Barrett's oesophagus provide no benefit in terms of reduced …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012