- Anneke Lucassen, consultanta (annekel@soton.ac.uk),
- Eila Watson, senior research officerb,
- Diana Eccles, consultanta
- a Wessex Regional Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton SO16 5YA
- b CRC Primary Care Education Research Group, Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford OX3 7LG
- Correspondence to: A Lucassen
A 35 year old woman with a family history of breast cancer was in need of advice. Her two sisters, aged 34 and 38, were healthy and not affected, but her mother had developed breast cancer at the age of 48, and her mother's paternal aunt had developed it at 39 (figure). The sisters lived in different parts of the United Kingdom. Her elder sister had been told that this family history was not important and that she would not need any screening until she was eligible for the national screening programme, whereas her younger sister had already had a mammogram and been told that she should have these yearly from the age of 35. The patient was confused and asked her general practitioner whether she should have mammography. The general practitioner wrote to the local genetics service for advice.
Summary points
There have been no randomised controlled trials of mammography in women under 50 with a family history of breast cancer
The sensitivity and specificity of mammography are lower in women aged under 50 than in those over 50
There is no NHS funding for mammographic screening of women under 50 with a family history of breast cancer, although such screening is performed regularly
The current consensus view is that mammography for women under 50 is appropriate if there is a certain degree of family history of breast cancer
Guidelines for such screening are available locally through most clinical genetics departments
An area of confusion
Our experience with such enquiries suggested that the patient and her doctor were not alone in their confusion. Nationally and internationally, recommendations for screening women under 50 with a family history of breast cancer vary enormously. When family members are separated geographically they often receive different advice in both primary and secondary care. There is a plethora of local guidelines …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27