This article has a correction
Please see: Bringing ordinary doctors into the genetics party
Please see: Bringing ordinary doctors into the genetics party
- Tessa Richards
- spoke to three specialists with differing opinions
Making genetics everyone's business
The government's plan to boost genetics is welcome news to John Burn, director of the Northern Genetics Service, Newcastle upon Tyne
The government's portrayal last week of the United Kingdom as “genetics valley” is a shot in the arm for its geneticists. Here was the ailing NHS being described by the health secretary as “uniquely placed to maximise the health benefits of the genetics advances.” And along with the rhetoric came a pledge of £30m ($42m) to double the number of specialist geneticists and extend their services (see p 1018).
No wonder Professor Burn, director of the Northern Genetics Service, at Newcastle University, is positive. After 27 years in the field, he shares the view that the NHS offers unique opportunities to conduct clinical research and develop comprehensive services. He also welcomes what he describes as “the endorsement of clinical geneticists as the leaders in the move to bring genetics out of specialised centres into everyday practice.”
Behind closed doors in genetic circles, there has been an unproductive and at times acrimonious dispute about professional boundaries. The genetics revolution has seen molecular geneticists, public health physicians, primary care doctors, physicians, and surgeons rapidly moving into erstwhile specialist geneticist “territory.”
While some have railed, Professor Burn has adopted what he calls the Dodge City principle. “If you have a rifle and a horse, you get a badge to join the posse.” Whatever his methods—and I suspect drive, charm, and guile are there somewhere—he has clearly been successful in capturing the enthusiasm and skills of different specialists to build up his multidisciplinary genetics unit.
While discussions continue about who takes the whip hand, it is evident that concerted action is needed. As genetic testing for rare inherited diseases is extended—and there is a prospect of DNA profiling before drug treatment and …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27