Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Should prophylaxis against stress ulcer be abandoned for patients in intensive care?

  1. Jean-Charles Preiser (preiserj@ulb.ac.be), clinical director
  1. Clinique Reine Fabiola, 73 avenue du Centenaire, B6061 Montignies-sur-Sambre, Belgium
  2. Wycombe Hospital, Wycombe HP11 2TT

    EDITOR—The meta-analysis of Messori et al clearly confirms the lack of usefulness of systematic prophylaxis against stress ulcer with H2 receptor antagonists or sucralfate,1 but an important issue is left unanswered by this study and by the meta-analysis of Cook et al.2 Indeed, some critically ill patients receive prophylaxis against stress ulcers for specific reasons, including brain injury (trauma, surgery, haemorrhage), steroid treatment, and coagulation abnormalities.

    Does the available literature support such prophylaxis for these patients? In other words, should intensivists prescribe stress ulcer prophylaxis for selected subgroups of patients? If the available literature does not resolve this issue, should the further trials suggested by Messori et …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL