- Raj Padwal, clinical research fellowa,
- Sharon E Straus, assistant professorb,
- Finlay A McAlister (Finlay.McAlister@ualberta.ca), assistant professora
- a Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AL, Canada T6G 2R7,
- b Division of General Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1XS
- Correspondence to: F A McAlister
This is the second in a series of five articles
Blood pressure, like any physiological variable, is normally distributed in the population. Not surprisingly, expert bodies disagree substantially on the definition of hypertension—of the 27 national hypertension societies represented at the 17th world conference of the Hypertension League Council held in Montreal in 1997, 14 use 140/90 mm Hg to diagnose hypertension and 13 use 160/95 mm Hg.1
Summary points
There is a continuous, strong, and graded relation between blood pressure and cardiovascular disease, but no clear threshold value separates hypertensive patients who will experience future cardiovascular events from those who will not
Risk of cardiovascular disease depends on blood pressure, coexistent risk factors, and whether there is hypertensive damage to target organs
Numerous factors definitely increase cardiovascular risk, including age, male sex, family history, raised cholesterol, smoking, diabetes mellitus, obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and left ventricular hypertrophy
Models can be used to predict an individual's risk of cardiovascular disease to define the expected benefits and harms of treatment
Hypertension and cardiovascular risk
Relative risk
Most population based studies confirm that hypertension increases an individual's risk of various cardiovascular consequences approximately two to three times (figure). Large population based cohort studies consistently show continuous, strong, and graded relations between blood pressure (particularly systolic pressure) and the subsequent occurrence of various atherosclerotic events. 2 3 The sizes of the relative risks reported in each study depend on the duration of follow up and the definition of hypertension in use.4 These relative risks are consistent across all settings5 and for all patient subgroups, including those with and without known atherosclerotic disease.6
Risk of atherosclerotic disease in people with hypertension
Multiple high quality long term cohort studies and randomised clinical trials have shown that the risks from raised blood pressure can be partially reversed. 6 7 Two important …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27