Letters

Continuity in general practice

BMJ 2001; 322 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7288.737 (Published 24 March 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;322:737
  1. George Taylor (g.b.taylor@doctors.org.uk), general practitioner
  1. GuidePost Medical Group, Choppington, Northumberland NE 62 5RA
  2. Mill Stream Surgery, Benson, Oxfordshire OX10 6RL

    Continuity is fine, but not for everything

    EDITOR—With reference to the article by Guthrie and Wyke,1 continuity in general practice is one of those obvious good things, but it is too complicated to be something with an easy answer, an all or nothing. In 1988 I wrote a personal view which proposed that patients might see a different doctor for acute illness than for their long term problems.2 They might even travel to see this personal doctor. This was met with some amazement by some of my colleagues.

    The changes in a society that now expects to be able to get money at midnight and shop in Tesco at 2 am (and I am as guilty as anyone else) means that, in places where general practice demand is high, systems have to be developed to cope. So we have walk in centres, triage systems, or duty doctors seeing all those strange things, social, medical, or just “I'm off work today,” that need to be seen now. In quiet places of low demand, …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe