- Michael A Cornbleet (michael.cornbleet@scotland.gsi.gov.uk), medical director,
- Catriona S K Ross, specialist registrar in palliative medicine
- Marie Curie Centre Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH10 7DR
EDITOR—Nahin and Straus highlight the problems of conducting clinically rigorous research in complementary medicine.1 They are right, though, to emphasise the need for such research; in an era of evidence based medicine it is difficult to justify deploying resources in the absence of convincing benefit. Complementary treatments have many advocates in palliative medicine, and many hospice services offer, or are under pressure to offer, such treatments. We have reported a pilot study of a randomised prospective study …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012