- Kate Lothian, research assistant,
- Ian Philp, professor of health care for elderly people (i.philp@sheffield.ac.uk)
- Sheffield Institute for Studies on Ageing, Community Sciences Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU
- Correspondence to: I Philp
This is the first in a series of four articles
This series will explore key issues in the quality of health care for older people. The basis of these articles is the extensive literature reviews undertaken to inform the development of a national service framework for NHS care of older people in England. As a result of an investigation by the Observer newspaper in 1997, the UK Health Advisory Service published a report with 17 recommendations,1 including the establishment of the national service framework, made up of key indicators of quality care and service provision. Background work for the framework covered evidence about quality in the organisation and delivery of health care for older people. It included health promotion; disease prevention; primary health care; general hospital care; specialist care by geriatric, psychogeriatric, and palliative care services; intermediate care and long term care in the community; and residential and nursing homes. Detailed attention was also given to the care of older people with stroke, falls and their consequences, depression, and dementia. Advice was based not only on evidence based practice but also on the value of fair access to care, a person centred approach, and whole systems working. This series will focus on four areas relating to health care for older people. This first article examines issues relating to the dignity and autonomy of older people.
Summary points
Anecdotal evidence suggests that older people's dignity and autonomy is being undermined in the health care setting
Many healthcare professionals hold stereotypical, negative attitudes towards older people
Tackling negative attitudes through exposure and education can help to preserve older patients' dignity and autonomy
Giving older people and their carers adequate information for them to make informed choices about care further increases autonomy
Insensitivity and disrespect
Health services should aim to preserve dignity and autonomy and minimise distress …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27