Papers

Duration of breast feeding and arterial distensibility in early adult life: population based study

BMJ 2001; 322 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7287.643 (Published 17 March 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;322:643
  1. C P M Leeson, research fellow (cpm_leeson{at}hotmail.com)a,
  2. M Kattenhorn, vascular technicianb,
  3. J E Deanfield, professorb,
  4. A Lucas, professora
  1. a Medical Research Council Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH
  2. b Vascular Physiology Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London WC1N 3JH
  1. Correspondence to: C P M Leeson

    Abstract

    Objectives: To test the hypothesis that duration of breast feeding is related to changes in vascular function relevant to the development of cardiovascular disease.

    Design: Population based observational study.

    Setting: Cambridge.

    Participants: 331 adults (171 women, 160 men) aged between 20 and 28 years, born in Cambridge Maternity Hospital.

    Main outcome measures: Distensibility of brachial artery, type and duration of infant feeding, current lipid profile, and other cardiovascular risk factors.

    Results: The longer the period of breast feeding the less distensible the artery wall in early adult life, with no sex differences (regression coefficient = —3.93 μm/month, 95% confidence interval —7.29 to —0.57, P=0.02). However, in those breast fed for less than four months, arterial distensibility was not significantly reduced compared with an exclusively formula fed group. The vascular changes observed were not explained by alterations in plasma cholesterol concentration in adult life.

    Conclusions: Breast feeding in infancy is related to reduced arterial function 20 years later. These data should not alter current recommendations in favour of breast feeding, which has several benefits for infant health. Further work is needed, however, to explore the optimal duration of breast feeding in relation to cardiovascular outcomes.

    Introduction

    Nutrition in early postnatal life may have major, long term “programming” effects on the physiology, metabolism, and clinical outcome of animals and humans.13 Coronary artery disease is one outcome in humans linked to early growth and nutrition. Although breast feeding has been associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease, men born earlier this century who had still been breast fed aged 1 year had higher rates of ischaemic heart disease 60-70 years later compared with the expected rate for men of that age.2 If this observation were causal, it would raise an important question about the optimal duration of breast feeding.

    Although observational evidence linking early nutrition to later cardiovascular disease might be subject to confounding, experimental evidence also exists linking atherosclerosis and breast feeding in non-human primates. Studies in baboons that were breast fed or formula fed throughout infancy and then placed on a Western style diet, high in saturated fats, showed that those previously breast fed had an abnormal lipid profile and more arterial fatty streaks in adulthood.1 One hypothesis was that breast feeding programmed baboons to be conservative with cholesterol—perhaps appropriately for their natural diet—but when they consumed a Western diet this programming led to arterial disease. Were these findings supported in humans, it would have implications for infants weaned on to a Western diet.

    We studied a UK population to test further the hypothesis that duration of breast feeding might influence later emergence of vascular disease. To minimise potential influences of other lifestyle factors throughout adulthood we studied a young cohort. This was feasible because early pathophysiological changes in the artery, relevant to the development of atherosclerosis, can now be measured early in life with non-invasive imaging techniques. 4 5 Our group has already shown links between vascular dysfunction and growth and nutrition during childhood. 6 7 In this study, we measured arterial distensibility, a measure of vessel wall stiffness, in a large cohort of adults in their 20s and related it to duration of breast feeding.

    Participants and methods

    Study design

    We studied 331 subjects (160 men; 171 women) aged 20 to 28 years born in Cambridge Maternity Hospital. We invited random samples of those born between 1969 and 1975 to attend a clinic for evaluation of cardiovascular risk profile by venepuncture, questionnaire, physical measurements, and vascular studies. Invitations were sent until the planned sample size was reached. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. To determine possible biases in the study sample, we compared the distribution of risk factors in this group to that in the United Kingdom and to data obtained in our questionnaire from a subgroup of people who initially declined to participate.

    Measurement of cardiovascular risk factors

    We analysed a fasting venous blood sample for insulin, glucose, and lipid profile using routine methods. Weight, height, blood pressure, and smoking history were recorded. We assessed social influences by attained education level and socioeconomic groupings.8 Before attending, participants collected information from their mothers on how they had been fed as an infant. We grouped them as either only bottle fed or having received breast milk. For those who had been breast fed, we recorded how long breast feeding had continued.9

    Vascular study measurements

    Distension of the brachial artery during the cardiac cycle was measured as described previously. 7 10 Briefly, the artery was imaged with an Acuson 128XP/10 and movement of the arterial walls recorded with an automated wall tracking system (Ingenious Medical Systems, Arnhem, Netherlands). By relating change in diameter over the cardiac cycle to pulse pressure, “stiffness” of the vessel wall can be quantified.

    Statistical analysis

    We assessed continuous relations between explanatory variables and arterial distensibility using multiple regression. Variables were related to absolute distension with pulse pressure, age, sex, and vessel size as independent variables.7 Further models examined adjustment for other factors. To investigate the effect of duration of breast feeding further, the group was dichotomised around the median duration of breast feeding. We then assessed differences between these divisions, as well as other groups (such as breast fed compared with bottle fed), using t tests. Distensibility was represented as a coefficient (change in arterial cross sectional area between diastole and systole relative to the area at diastole, divided by pulse pressure). 5 7

    Results

    We sent invitations to 1526 people, of whom 420 (28%) agreed to participate, 229 (15%) declined, and 877 (57%) did not reply. In all, 344 (23%) subjects were able to attend for vascular investigations. Full details of vascular function, risk factors, and infant feeding practice were available for 331 (96%) of these (table 1). The study group had similar body size, body mass index, blood pressure, and smoking rates to young adults generally in the United Kingdom.11

    Table 1.

    Main characteristics of study population. Values are mean (SD or range) unless stated otherwise

    View this table:

    Arterial distensibility

    The distensibility coefficient was 0.129 mm Hg−1 in men and 0.145 mm Hg−1 in women (95% confidence interval for difference —0.032 to —0.002, P=0.04). There was no variation with age (regression coefficient= —1.6, 95% confidence interval —4.9 to 1.8, P=0.36). As expected, reduced distensibility was related to increased total serum cholesterol concentration and systolic blood pressure (table 2).7 Social class and smoking were unrelated to arterial function. Arterial distensibility was not related to birthweight or weight in infancy.

    Table 2.

    Linear regression coefficients for associations between main variables and arterial distension (with pulse pressure, age, sex, and resting vessel size included in model). Units are μm per unit change in explanatory variable

    View this table:

    There was an inverse relation between duration of breast feeding and arterial distensibility (regression coefficient = —3.93 μm/month, 95% confidence interval —7.29 to —0.57, P=0.02) (figure). The regression coefficient was negative in men (—2.9) and women (—4.3) analysed separately, although because of reduced sample size the result was significant only in women. There was no interaction between sex and duration of breast feeding, and we therefore conducted further analyses on the combined cohort. Participants who had been exclusively breast fed for less than four months had similar distensibility to those who had never been breast fed (distensibility in bottle fed=0.1388 mm Hg−1 and breast fed less than four months=0.1457 mm Hg−1, mean difference=0.007 mm Hg−1, 95% confidence interval —0.026 to 0.012, P=0.46). Those who had been breast fed for four months or more had significantly lower distensibility than those who had been breast fed for less than four months (distensibility for those breast fed for four months or more=0.1200 mm Hg−1, mean difference from those breast fed for less than four months=—0.026 mm Hg−1, —0.038 to —0.048, P=0.02).

    Figure1

    Mean (SE) distensibility coefficient for brachial artery in relation to duration of breast feeding

    Relation of duration of breast feeding to cardiovascular risk factors and other variables

    Duration of breast feeding was unrelated to lipid profile, body size, body mass index, smoking patterns, blood pressure, social class, birthweight, or prevalence of premature cardiovascular disease in relatives (regression coefficient between duration of breast feeding and cholesterol concentration=—0.16 months/mmol/l, 95% confidence interval —0.49 to 0.17, P=0.4). The strength of the association between duration of breast feeding and distensibility was unaffected by inclusion of current lipid profile, body mass index, height, weight, or social class in the regression model (table 3).

    Table 3.

    Linear regression coefficients for relation between length of breast feeding and distensibility with adjustments for pulse pressure, age, sex, and resting vessel plus cholesterol concentration, body mass index, and socioeconomic factors

    View this table:

    Discussion

    We found that distensibility of the brachial artery in young adults was related to the duration of breast feeding in infancy. Longer duration of breast feeding was associated with stiffer arteries. As we studied young adults, our results are less likely to be confounded by the effects of other cardiovascular risk factors that are present in older cohorts. The results suggest that the effect of breast feeding on cardiovascular risk occurs early in life.

    Possible explanations for the effect

    Breast feeding evolved in mammals over millions of years and is generally considered optimal for humans. The commonly cited advantages over formula feeding include reduced infection and atopy and increased cognitive development.12 The optimal duration of breast feeding remains inadequately researched. We found an apparent adverse outcome in people who had had prolonged breast feeding. This finding is consistent with the results of an observational study in which men who had been breast fed at 1 year had an increased risk of ischaemic heart disease 60 years later.2 This finding was suggested to be due to programming of cholesterol metabolism in response to the unique lipid or hormone contents of breast milk. These factors might alter expression of hepatic enzymes or low density lipoprotein receptors, changing the response to a high fat diet later in life.1316 This hypothesis is consistent with the experimental studies in primates, where breastfed baboons given a Western style high saturated fat diet had more early atherosclerotic changes in adulthood than formula fed animals.

    In our study, however, longer duration of breast feeding was not associated with significantly higher total cholesterol or lipoprotein concentration in adulthood. Furthermore, models relating breast feeding to distensibility were not affected by inclusion of current lipid profile. Thus our results do not support a hypothesis of deranged blood lipid profiles in adulthood.

    An alternative hypothesis would be that breast feeding influences lipid metabolism much earlier, during the infant feeding period, resulting in early formation of arterial fatty streaks. Animal studies show arterial elasticity is reduced during fatty streak formation in infancy before other pathophysiological changes.17 Cholesterol is laid down in the vessel wall from the first months, with a peak prevalence of fatty streaks during the first year18 when cholesterol concentrations are higher in breastfed infants. 19 20 If breast feeding is extended throughout infancy, the vessel wall is exposed to raised circulating cholesterol concentrations for longer. Most arterial lesions seem to regress initially, but in the primate studies above, animals breast fed as infants and then placed on a high saturated fat diet had more fatty streaks in adulthood.1 In humans, such early arterial changes might persist into later life if subsequent diet interferes with their natural regression. A small, inconclusive postmortem study of adolescents showed more arterial lesions in those who had been breast fed, further supporting an early effect of breast feeding.21 More work is needed to investigate dietary differences in vascular lipid deposition in early life.

    Relevance of arterial distensibility

    Arterial distensibility is known to diminish with age in relation to cardiovascular risk factors and is reduced in subjects with frank coronary disease. 22 23 Indeed, the potential impact of such risk factors is apparent in this study, which showed reduced arterial distensibility in young adults with higher blood pressure, cholesterol, or body mass index. Although further investigation is needed, it seems likely that arterial distensibility is related to risk of vascular disease.

    There was no direct record of feeding method or duration. We used maternal recall, which has been independently validated for collecting such data9 and provides reproducible data 30 or more years after birth.24 Further early dietary information was limited as the study was retrospective. Prospective investigations could take account of age of weaning and subsequent diet as well as the more recent secular changes in infant feeding, notably duration of use and design of infant formula.

    Comparison of the relative influence of risk factors on arterial distensibility suggests that breast feeding has an important effect. Extending breast feeding by two months has an effect on arterial distensibility that is broadly equivalent to that produced by a 1 mmol/l rise in cholesterol or 4 mm Hg increase in blood pressure. Although the effect is apparently larger in women, there was no significant difference between sexes. This may be because the underlying arterial changes were established before development of the hormonal protection that reduces the incidence of coronary disease in women during reproductive life.

    Implications

    We emphasise that our observational data do not establish a causal relation between length of breast feeding and cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, our findings are supported by previous human and experimental animal data. 1 2 We tried to minimise confounding by studying a young cohort and adjusted for potential influences on distensibility that might also relate to duration of breast feeding. Further confounding should be explored in future studies.

    Since breast feeding is widely accepted and promoted as the best nutrition for infants, any suggestion of an association between duration of breast feeding and vascular health requires careful and critical examination. We took full account of the feeding period and showed a graded relation between length of breast feeding and the decline in distensibility. However, arterial distensibility was similar in those breast fed for up to four months to that in participants who were not breast fed.

    At this stage our findings should not influence current advice on the importance of breast feeding. Even if prolonged breast feeding were confirmed to have disadvantages, these would need to be carefully weighed against the advantages. For example, in developing countries the benefit of prolonged breast feeding in infants and toddlers would be an overriding consideration. Nevertheless, there is an urgent public health need to study further the possible influence of a longer period of breast feeding on the evolution of arterial disease.

    What is already known on this topic

    No data exist on the optimal duration of breast feeding

    One study found that men who had been breast fed at 1 year had higher rates of ischaemic heart disease

    What this study adds

    Arterial distensibility (a marker of early cardiovascular disease) in adults aged 20-28 decreased with increasing duration of breast feeding

    No difference in distensibility was found between participants who had been bottle fed and those breast fed for less than four months

    Duration of breast feeding was not related to cholesterol concentration in adulthood

    Any effect of breast feeding on cardiovascular risk probably occurs in infancy

    Acknowledgments

    We thank Ian Merryweather, Sarah Jones, and Tristan Cope for help with data collection and laboratory analysis and Dr David Muller for coordinating the biochemical work.

    Contributors: CPML and AL designed the study, analysed and interpreted the data, and wrote the paper. MK and JED contributed to the design of the study and revision of the paper. CPML and MK managed the study and data collection. CPML and AL will act as guarantors.

    Footnotes

    • Funding The work was funded by the Medical Research Council. All work in the Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital also benefits from NHS research and development funding.

    • Competing interests The centre has collaborated with the infant food industry for its outcome studies on nutrition.

    References

    1. 1.
    2. 2.
    3. 3.
    4. 4.
    5. 5.
    6. 6.
    7. 7.
    8. 8.
    9. 9.
    10. 10.
    11. 11.
    12. 12.
    13. 13.
    14. 14.
    15. 15.
    16. 16.
    17. 17.
    18. 18.
    19. 19.
    20. 20.
    21. 21.
    22. 22.
    23. 23.
    24. 24.
    View Abstract