Alder Hey report condemns doctors, management, and coronerBMJ 2001; 322 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7281.255 (Published 03 February 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;322:255
- Mark Hunter
A catalogue of deception and malpractice by an unethical pathologist, compounded by severe management failings and an evasive and paternalistic attitude towards bereaved parents, are the main findings of the long awaited inquiry into Alder Hey Hospital in Liverpool.
Four members of the hospital staff, including the chief executive, were suspended from their jobs this week following the report's publication.
The report is every bit as scathing as described by the health secretary, Alan Milburn, with the bulk of its criticism aimed at pathologist Professor Dick van Velzen, who worked at Alder Hey between 1988 and 1995.
However, the report also contains caustic condemnation of coroner Roy Barter, Professor van Velzen's pathology colleagues, and the management teams of both Alder Hey Hospital and the University of Liverpool.
The report comes after a one year inquiry, chaired by Michael Redfern, QC, into how thousands of organs taken at postmortem examination—often without the parents' consent—were …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial