Not again!BMJ 2001; 322 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7281.247 (Published 03 February 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;322:247
Preventing errors lies in redesign—not exhortation
- Donald M Berwick, president and chief executive officer (email@example.com)
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA
Again, a young patient with leukaemia is dying, not from his disease, but from an erroneous intrathecal injection of vincristine, intended for intravenous use.1 Again, the newspapers express outrage; they count up to 13 identical cases over the past 15 years. The hospital apologises, again, and two doctors are suspended, pending “investigation.” The NHS explains; steps will be taken, again.
And trust erodes, again, as a confused public, grieving with the patient and his family, wonder if they are safe. Spurred by the headlines, each asks, again, “Could I be next?” The answer, of course, is, “Yes.”
Less than a year ago the chief medical officer of England's NHS, in a landmark report on threats to patient safety in the NHS, courageously labelled the problem of medical errors as pervasive and consequential. He promised progress and even specified this very error—intrathecal injection of intravenous chemotherapeutic agents—as one targeted for “zero” occurrences: not just safer, but perfectly safe.2 So how could this happen—again?
The answer is surprisingly mundane. It is this: we are human, and …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial