Letter

Revised guideline for prescribing vigabatrin in children

BMJ 2001; 322 doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7280.236 (Published 27 January 2001)
Cite this as: BMJ 2001;322:236

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Guideline's claim about infantile spasms is not based on appropriate evidence

  1. Andrew L Lux (andrew.lux@ruh-bath.swest.nhs.uk), clinical research fellow,
  2. Stuart W Edwards, UKISS research coordinator,
  3. John P Osborne, professor of paediatrics and child health,
  4. Eleanor Hancock, specialist registrar in paediatric neurology,
  5. Anthony L Johnson, statistician,
  6. Colin R Kennedy, consultant paediatric neurologist,
  7. Finbar J K O'Callaghan, specialist registrar in paediatric neurology,
  8. Richard W Newton, consultant paediatric neurologist,
  9. Christopher M Verity, consultant paediatric neurologist
  1. Bath Unit for Research in Paediatrics, Children's Centre, Royal United Hospital, Bath BA1 3NG
  2. Royal United Hospital, Bath BA1 3NG
  3. Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London SW10 9NH
  4. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 2SR
  5. Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO9 4XY
  6. Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester M27 1HA
  7. Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ
  8. Members of the group are: Richard Appleton, consultant paediatric neurologist, Liverpool (to whom correspondence should be addressed at the Roald Dahl EEG Unit, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool L12 2AP); Peter Baxter, consultant paediatric neurologist, Sheffield; David Calver, consultant ophthalmologist, London; Celia Cramp, consultant paediatrician, Shrewsbury; John Gibbs, consultant paediatrician, Chester; Graham Harding, consultant clinical neurophysiologist, Birmingham; John Livingston, consultant paediatric neurologist, Leeds; Richard Robinson, consultant paediatric neurologist, London; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt, consultant paediatric ophthalmologist, London; Sheila Wallace, consultant paediatric neurologist, Cardiff; and John Wild, senior lecturer in vision sciences, Birmingham.

    EDITOR—The Vigabatrin Paediatric Advisory Group, which in 1998 produced a guideline to “help clinicians when prescribing vigabatrin in children,” has now revised it. 1 2 We, the steering committee of the United Kingdom infantile spasm study (UKISS), responded to the original guideline.3 Our opinion was that there is no evidence that vigabatrin is a better treatment of infantile spasms than hormonal treatments, such as prednisolone and synthetic adrenocorticotrophic hormone preparations.

    When we challenged the claim that vigabatrin is the drug of choice, the advisory group offered no rebuttal. Now the claim is stated again, without any appropriate new evidence being produced. Indeed, the finding that visual field losses attributable to vigabatrin occur in children as well as adults strengthens any challenge to the guideline's claim. …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    BMJ most popular