Editorials

The renaissance of C reactive protein

BMJ 2001; 322 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7277.4 (Published 06 January 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;322:4

It may be a marker not only of acute illness but also of future cardiovascular disease

  1. Mark B Pepys, professor of medicine (m.pepys{at}rfc.ucl.ac.uk),
  2. Abi Berger, science editor
  1. Department of Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London NW3 2PF
  2. BMJ

    C reactive protein (CRP) has traditionally been used as an acute phase marker of tissue injury, infection, and inflammation, but the use of high sensitivity assays has recently shown that increased C reactive protein values predict future cardiovascular disease.

    The C reactive protein response has no diagnostic specificity, but serial measurements can be helpful in clinical management. It is a powerful screening test for organic disease and is useful in monitoring known infectious or inflammatory diseases and their response to treatment.1 Although a high value is unequivocal evidence of tissue damaging disease, C reactive protein values (unlike most other clinical laboratory tests) can really only be interpreted when all other clinical and laboratory information is available. Nevertheless, serial measurements of C reactive protein, added to the full clinical picture, contribute usefully to diagnosis, prognosis, and management.1

    C reactive protein is a trace protein in healthy subjects, with a median concentration of around 1 mg/l, but values can exceed 400 mg/l in the acute phase response. Routine applications in adult medicine require measurement above 5-10 mg/l, but the development of high sensitivity assays has recently allowed clinicians to explore the role of C reactive protein in atherosclerotic disease.

    Predictor of coronary events

    Increased C reactive protein values significantly predict coronary events in outpatients with stable or unstable angina2 and in hospital patients with severe unstable angina3 and predict outcome after coronary angioplasty.4 Even in healthy asymptomatic people in the general population individuals with baseline C reactive protein values in the top third of the distribution (geometric mean 2.4 mg/l) have twice the future risk of a coronary event than with those with values in the bottom third (mean 1.0 mg/l).5 Similar relationships exist for stroke and peripheral vascular disease.

    C reactive protein values increase with smoking and body mass index but the association with coronary events remains after adjustment for these potential confounders. The same is true for some other inflammatory markers, suggesting an association between inflammation and atherothrombosis. Inflammation is a central component of atherogenesis and is important in plaque instability and rupture, leading to thrombosis. However, it is not known whether increased C reactive protein production reflects arterial inflammation or inflammation elsewhere in the body. Chronic low grade infections may be risk factors for coronary heart disease, but C reactive protein concentrations do not correlate with serological markers of Helicobacter pylori or Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in the general population.5

    In contrast, the association between C reactive protein values and body mass index probably reflects the importance of adipose tissue as a source of baseline circulating interleukin-6, the main cytokine mediator of increased C reactive protein production.6 Increased C reactive protein values within the normal reference range may thus reflect mass of adipose tissue rather than actual inflammation. The question also arises of whether C reactive protein itself might contribute to atherothrombosis.

    A pathogenetic role?

    C reactive protein selectively binds to low density lipoprotein, particularly the partly degraded low density lipoprotein found within atherosclerotic plaques, and is generally present together with it, and activated complement, within such plaques. 7 8 Bound C reactive protein activates complement, is proinflammatory, and may thus contribute to atherogenesis. C reactive protein may also increase macrophage production of tissue factor,9 the coagulation initiator responsible for occlusive thrombotic events. However, it will be possible to test whether C reactive protein has a pathogenetic role only when drugs are developed that selectively inhibit C reactive protein production or binding. Meanwhile, it is of interest that statins lower C reactive protein values,10 suggesting that some of their protective effects may be mediated through suppression of inflammation or cytokines.

    In contrast to the uncertain role of C reactive protein in the artery wall, there is strong evidence that C reactive protein increases ischaemic myocardial damage. C reactive protein production increases in all patients with myocardial infarction, peaking at about 50 hours, and high values are associated with a poor short term and long term prognosis. All fatal acute infarcts contain C reactive protein alongside activated complement,11 and in experimental studies complement activation contributes importantly to infarct size. It has now been confirmed that human C reactive protein, via its capacity to activate complement, greatly increases infarct size after experimental coronary artery ligation,12 and this presumably also happens in patients.

    A spur to research

    Routine empirical measurement of C reactive protein is a valuable aid to patient management across a broad range of clinical practice. Sensitive C reactive protein assay may become a new risk assessment marker for cardiovascular disease, and guidelines for its application are under discussion. While the potential management implications of a raised C reactive protein value in asymptomatic subjects are not yet clear, in those with active coronary disease a raised value definitely identifies a high risk group likely to require interventions. The possibility that C reactive protein may contribute to pathogenesis of atherothrombosis, and the fact that it increases ischaemic myocardial injury, should spur the development of specific drugs to inhibit C reactive protein.

    Finally, it is intriguing to wonder whether the excellent correlation between plasma C reactive protein concentrations and disease activity reflects not just the acute phase response to the original underlying pathological process, but also the capacity of C reactive protein to exacerbate existing tissue damage: possibly the more C reactive protein you produce, the sicker you get.

    Footnotes

    • MBP has received fees for speaking and consulting about C reactive protein from Abbott Laoratories and for speaking from Dade-Behring and has collaborated on C reactive protein testing with Roche Diagnostics.

    References

    1. 1.
    2. 2.
    3. 3.
    4. 4.
    5. 5.
    6. 6.
    7. 7.
    8. 8.
    9. 9.
    10. 10.
    11. 11.
    12. 12.
    View Abstract

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe