Letters

Income inequality and mortality in Canada and the United States

BMJ 2000; 321 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1532 (Published 16 December 2000) Cite this as: BMJ 2000;321:1532

Third explanation is plausible

  1. Tony Blakely, New Zealand Health Research Council Training fellow (tblakely@wnmeds.ac.nz),
  2. Alistair Woodward, head of department
  1. Department of Public Health, Wellington School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
  2. Department of Tropical Hygiene and Public Health, Heidelberg University, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
  3. Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0T6
  4. Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6T 1Z3
  5. School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA

    EDITOR—Ross et al report that income inequality in the state or province and metropolitan area is associated with mortality in the United States but not in Canada.1 They offer two explanations for this discrepancy. Firstly, this association is observed only at levels of inequality present in the United States, not the lower levels observed in Canada. Secondly, the actual association of income inequality with mortality is modified by the social and political characteristics specific to a place.

    There is, however, another possible explanation: confounding of the association of income inequality with health at the state level (or metropolitan area level) in the United States. This is not the same as confounding at the individual level by, for example, personal income, which varies between states.2 State level confounding may occur when characteristics of the states are correlated with income inequality, remain associated with mortality within strata of states by income inequality, and hence cause a spurious association of income inequality with mortality. Two possible candidates are the extent of rurality and the welfare policies of the states. Both vary between states, are plausibly related to population health, and are probably correlated with the geographically biased distribution of income inequality.

    The United States provides a rich natural experiment to study the association of income inequality with health, and several studies have now replicated the association of state level income inequality with health using different data sets. 3 4 But the use of different data sets in these studies is akin to reanalysing one cross sectional study of the same …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe