Education And Debate

Lifestyle medicines

BMJ 2000; 321 doi: (Published 25 November 2000) Cite this as: BMJ 2000;321:1341

This article has a correction. Please see:

  1. David Gilbert, senior fellowa ([email protected]),
  2. Tom Walley, professor of clinical pharmacologyb,
  3. Bill New, independent health policy analystc
  1. a Office for Public Management, 252b Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8JT
  2. b Department of Pharmacology, University of Liverpool L69 3GF
  3. c 9 Countess Road, London NW5 2NS
  1. Correspondence to: D Gilbert
  • Accepted 17 July 2000

Sildenafil and orlistat, prescribed for erectile dysfunction and obesity respectively, have been labelled as “lifestyle drugs” in the popular imagination. Although this description may trivialise serious medical conditions for which the drugs are indicated, it encapsulates concerns that some indications for these drugs might be regarded as issues of personal choice rather than illness. It is difficult to define what we mean by the term lifestyle drug since the perception of what is illness and what is within the sphere of personal responsibility rather than health care may depend on whether one is a potential patient or a potential “payer.” The perception may depend on social and cultural norms too,1 and it is also a function of how a medicine is used. For instance, most people would agree that the prescription of sildenafil for a healthy man unhappy with his sexual performance is a lifestyle use, but would consider differently the case of a diabetic man with neuropathy.

A working definition for this paper might be that a lifestyle drug is one used for “non-health” problems or for problems that lie at the margins of health and wellbeing (see table). A wider definition would include drugs that are used for health problems that might be better treated by a change in lifestyle; this definition might include drugs such as lipid lowering agents or proton pump inhibitors.

Summary points

Lifestyle drugs are drugs used for non-health problems or for conditions that lie at the boundary between a health need and a lifestyle wish

These drugs threaten the financial sustainability of current health systems

Traditional approaches to regulating medicines are not effective for lifestyle drugs; coordinated action is needed to manage pharmaceutical policy nationally and locally

Greater public involvement is essential in establishing priorities

Lifestyle drugs may promote debate about appropriate directions of …

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Free trial

Register for a free trial to to receive unlimited access to all content on for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial