This article has a correction
Please see: BMA approves acupuncture
BMA report is wrong
- R A Moore (biochemistandrew.moore@pru.ox.ac.uk), consultant,
- H J McQuay, professor of pain relief,
- A D Oldman, research associate,
- L E Smith, research associate
- Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, The Churchill, Oxford OX3 7LJ
- Kovacs Foundation, Scientific Department, Palma de Mallorca 07012, Spain
EDITOR—The BMA report on acupuncture is regrettable. It suggests, among other things, that acupuncture is effective for back pain, dental pain, and migraine. Three recent systematic reviews show the importance of basing judgments on high quality information.
For back pain, four randomised and blind studies showed no benefit; five open studies showed benefit.1 The BMA's conclusion that acupuncture was effective in back pain was based on all nine studies.
For dental pain, a review of 16 studies concluded that it was effective.2 Many of these were not randomised, were not blind, or had major flaws. Only three small studies were adequate, and these showed no convincing benefit.3
For migraine, trials showing a significant benefit from acupuncture were inadequately randomised or not blind.4 The reviewers themselves were highly circumspect about ascribing any clinical significance to acupuncture.
The BMA report concluded that results for acupuncture are inconclusive in …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27