Authors' standard compares well with WHO standard
- Youfa Wang, PhD candidate, Carolina Population Center (youfa@emailunc.edu),
- Joanna Q Wang, doctoral student, Department of Biostatistics
- School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, CB#8120, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA
- Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1NIEH
- Institute of Population Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310006, People's Republic of China
- Wessex Growth Study, Mail Point 803, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD
- South and West Devon Health Authority, Dartington TQ9 6JE
EDITOR—Different standards have been proposed to define overweight and obesity in childhood, and as a result it is difficult to compare published results. An international standard is useful for making international comparisons and monitoring the global epidemic of obesity. The new standard proposed by Cole et al (the International Obesity Task Force standard) meets this demand.1 By contrast, the World Health Organization recommended using the sex-age specific body mass index 85th centiles derived from data from the United States' first national health and nutrition examination survey collected in 1971-4 to define adolescent overweight for international use. 2 3
Using data from large nationwide surveys from China (1991 China health and nutrition survey), Russia (1992 Russian longitudinal monitoring survey), and the United States (third national health and nutrition examination survey, 1988-94), we compared Cole et al's and the World Health Organization standards to assess overweight in children (aged 6-9) and adolescents (10-18). These three countries' total populations account for about a quarter of the global population.
We examined the prevalence of overweight in each country by using each standard. The table shows that the two standards produced consistent estimates of the prevalence of overweight, although that proposed by Cole et al (the IOTF standard) produced a slightly lower estimate in children than did the WHO standard but a slightly higher estimate in adolescents. In general, the agreement was better in all adolescents, girls aged 6-9, and male adolescents. We calculated the κ coefficient to examine the agreement at an individual level. κ≥0.8 suggests an excellent agreement.4 κ values also suggested an excellent agreement between these two standards, although the agreement varied by sample, age group, and sex.
- In this window
- In a new window
Estimates of prevalence of overweight (percentages) using IOTF …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012