Paper

Unjustified exclusion of elderly people from studies submitted to research ethics committee for approval: descriptive study

BMJ 2000; 321 doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7267.992 (Published 21 October 2000)
Cite this as: BMJ 2000;321:992
  1. Antony Bayer, director, Cardiff Memory Team (bayer@cf.ac.uk),
  2. Win Tadd, research fellow
  1. University Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Llandough Hospital, Penarth CF64 2XX
  1. Correspondence to: A Bayer
  • Accepted 16 June 2000

Ageism in clinical practice1 and published research2 is well recognised. We were interested in whether research protocols submitted to the local research ethics committee contained unjustified upper age limits and how the committee dealt with this.

Methods and results

We reviewed all studies submitted to Bro Taf local research ethics committee in the first seven months of 1999 to determine whether any upper age limits were justified and whether the committee had commented on such age restrictions. We then made a judgment on the appropriateness of the upper age limit.

Of 225 studies whose protocols were reviewed, 65 were on topics or conditions that automatically excluded elderly people. Five studies specifically concerned elderly people and had a lower age limit but no upper limit. Of the remaining 155, 90 (58%) had an upper age limit, which …

Rapid responses

THIS WEEK'S POLL

Read related article

See previous polls

BMJ most popular