Letters

Effect of on-site mental health professionals

BMJ 2000; 321 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7262.701/a (Published 16 September 2000) Cite this as: BMJ 2000;321:701

Longer trials are needed

  1. Mark Ashworth, research fellow
  1. Guy's, King's and St Thomas's Department of General Practice, Kings College London, London SE11 6SP
  2. National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL

    EDITOR—The systematic review by Bower and Sibbald of on-site mental health professionals was a welcome addition to the literature on the effectiveness of the talking therapies in primary care.1 In view of the effect on consultation rates, prescribing of psychotropic drugs, and referrals to secondary care, the conclusion drawn was that the evidence for a direct effect was strongest in relation to general practitioner referrals to secondary care providers.

    Six randomised controlled trials of direct effects on referrals were identified. Three were reported as showing referrals to be significantly reduced. Although some of the limitations of the studies were discussed, each of the six trials is flawed in terms of being able to generalise to everyday primary care

    One trial was described as showing a significant reduction in referrals when the stated P value was 0.56, which is not significant.2 Furthermore, the therapy offered was from a psychiatrist based in primary care …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe