- I M Cropleya, senior registrar in infection and tropical medicine,
- Diana N J Lockwooda, senior registrar in infection and tropical medicine (diana.lockwood{at}lshtm.ac.uk),
- D Mackb, chief medical laboratory scientific officer,
- G Pasvola, professor of infection and tropical medicine,
- R N Davidsona, senior lecturer in infection and tropical medicine
- a Lister Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ
- b Department of Haematology, Northwick Park Hospital
- Correspondence to: D N J Lockwood, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London WC1E 6AU
- Accepted 22 February 2000
A simple diagnostic strip test for Plasmodium falciparum malaria (ParaSight F test, Becton Dickinson Advanced Diagnostics) detects a water soluble antigen, histidine rich protein 2, which is produced by blood stages of P falciparum. High sensitivity and specificity have been reported for the test in areas where malaria is endemic1-3 and in studies of travellers returning from such areas. 4 5 We compared the test with standard blood film microscopy in febrile travellers returning to the United Kingdom from such areas.
Subjects, methods, and results
We studied 160 consecutive patients aged 9–77 years presenting between April 1994 and June 1996 to our unit with a history of fever and travel in the previous year to an area where malaria is endemic. Thin films were stained with Giemsa and read by an experienced microscopist. The ParaSight F test was performed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions; a pink band indicates a positive result. Each test took less than 10 minutes to perform. Thin films and test strips were read blind to each other.
In 45 patients falciparum malaria was the final diagnosis (table). At presentation 42 cases were detected by microscopy and 42 by the ParaSight F test. Parasitaemias ranged from <0.01% to 15% of erythrocytes parasitised. In one patient, the test was positive at presentation, and scanty (<0.001%) P falciparum trophozoites were detected on blood film only on day 2. In two other patients both the blood film and the test gave negative results at presentation but positive results on subsequent days. One patient had a positive test with a negative blood film; three days previously he had had halofantrine treatment for presumed malaria. One patient with pneumococcal meningitis had positive tests over three days with negative daily blood films. The test was negative in one patient with a P falciparum parasitaemia of <0.01%.
Results of tests for infection with Plasmodium falciparum and subsequent diagnosis. Values are numbers of patients
Test results were negative in all 113 other patients who did not have P falciparum infection, including 27 infected with other malarial species (23 with P vivax, 3 with P ovale, 1 with P malariae). Other diagnoses included diarrhoeal disease, dengue fever, typhoid, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, brucellosis, acute myeloid leukaemia, and infectious mononucleosis.
Compared with the final diagnosis, the ParaSight F test used at first presentation had a sensitivity of 93.3%, a specificity of 98.3%, a positive predictive value of 95.6%, and a negative predictive value of 97.4%.
Comment
The ParaSight F test is simple, rapid, and has adequate sensitivity and specificity for initial assessment of P falciparum infection in returning travellers. It identified all patients with P falciparum apart from one patient with a low parasitaemia of <0.01% and two patients with parasites not detected on initial microscopy. Positive test results in the patient treated with halofantrine are explained by the established persistence of histidine rich protein 2 in the blood for up to 10 days. Positive results of the patient with pneumococcal meningitis were taken to be a genuine false positives.
The test does not remove the need for blood film examination as it is not 100% sensitive at low parasitaemias, and repeated daily testing may be necessary to establish the diagnosis. Nor does the test give any indication of density of parasites, essential in planning management.
The ParaSight F test has a useful role in the initial screening of febrile returning travellers with suspected falciparum malaria, particularly where laboratory staff are not experienced in diagnosing malaria. The test can be considered a “side room” investigation, as it requires no special training. It may also be used to distinguish between the benign malarias and the potentially lethal falciparum malaria.
Acknowledgments
Contributors: DNJL and RND designed the study; DNJL, DM, and IMC carried out the study; IMC wrote the first draft of the paper, with subsequent input from GP, RD, and DNJL. DNJL is the guarantor for the study.
Footnotes
-
Funding ParaSight F test strips were provided by Becton-Dickinson.
-
Competing interests None declared.
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012