- Martin J Jarvis (martin.jarvis{at}ucl.ac.uk), professor of health psychologya,
- Eileen Goddard, principal survey researcherb,
- Vanessa Higgins, survey researcherb,
- Colin Feyerabend, principal biochemistc,
- Andrew Bryant, senior analystc,
- Derek G Cook, professor of epidemiologyd
- a ICRF Health Behaviour Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT
- b Office for National Statistics, Drummond Gate, London SW1V 2QQ
- c Medical Toxicology Unit, New Cross Hospital, London SE14 5ER
- d Department of Public Health Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE
- Correspondence to: M J Jarvis
- Accepted 14 June 2000
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether children's exposure to passive smoking has changed since the late 1980s.
Design: Cross sectional surveys of nationally representative samples of secondary school children carried out between 1988 and 1998 by Office for National Statistics.
Setting: England.
Subjects: Secondary school children aged 11-15.
Main outcome measures: Salivary cotinine concentrations in non-smoking children.
Results: Cotinine concentrations in all non-smoking children almost halved between 1988 and 1998, from a geometric mean of 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.11) ng/ml in 1988 to 0.52 (0.43 to 0.62) ng/ml in 1998. This reduction was largely due to reductions in exposure in children from non-smoking households and to decreases in the percentage of parents who smoked. Children living with mothers or fathers who smoked experienced little reduction in exposure.
Conclusions: Exposure to passive smoking among children in England has approximately halved since the late 1980s. This reduction is partly explained by the fall in the percentage of both mothers and fathers who smoke and is also likely to reflect reductions of smoking in public places. However, there is only limited evidence that children from smoking households have experienced a reduction in exposure through parents' avoidance of smoking in their presence.
Footnotes
-
Funding MJJ and AB are supported by the Imperial Cancer Research Fund.
-
Competing interests None declared.
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: The comforts of spiritualism
Published 23 May 2012
Re: The hardest thing: admitting error
Published 23 May 2012
Ice cream headache as a new example of “Cold headache” in Avicenna’s manuscript
Published 23 May 2012
Re: Randomised controlled trial of homoeopathy versus placebo in perennial allergic rhinitis with overview of four trial seriesCommentary: Larger trials are needed
Published 23 May 2012
Re: Testing athletes, and banning those who take drugs, is unjustifiable
Published 23 May 2012
Most responses
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (6 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32