Findings cannot be applied to general public
- Mark Harrison, third year medical student (M.H.Harrison@ncl.ac.uk),
- Caroline Jones, third year medical student,
- Elinor Brabin, third year medical student
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH
- Sleep Laboratory, Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
- Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel
- Sleep Disorders Unit, Loewenstein Hospital, Raanana, Israel
- Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel
EDITOR—The study by Lavie et al is the first to provide evidence that sleep apnoea is an independent risk factor for hypertension.1 We think, however, that the clinical implications put forward are limited by the chosen population and study design.
The findings of this study cannot be applied to the general population for the following reasons. Firstly, all the study population consists of patients referred to a sleep clinic and is therefore highly selected. Furthermore, we believe that patients' risk of comorbidity is significantly greater than that of the general population; for example, 22.8% of the control group were hypertensive. Associations in highly selected populations are open to bias,2 a factor not addressed by the authors.
We question whether patients should have been diagnosed as hypertensive on the basis of readings taken over a 24 hour period. Standard practice is to make a diagnosis on the basis of measurements taken on three separate occasions, eliminating influencing factors, in particular environmental stresses.
We agree with Locke that many of these problems could be overcome by adopting a new study design.3 We think, however, that a prospective cohort study is more suitable. Non-apnoeic patients from the general population would be matched and compared with patients with varying degrees of sleep apnoea and …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27