- G C Beattie, senior house officera,
- N R Ravi, staff gradea,
- Muriel Lewis, staff grade physicianb,
- Hiliary Williams, specialist registrarb,
- A W Blair, consultantc,
- I W Campbell, consultantb,
- G G P Browning, consultanta (ggpb@doctors.org.uk)
- a Department of Surgery, Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy KY2 5AH,
- b Department of Medicine, Victoria Hospital,
- c Department of Paediatrics, Victoria Hospital
- Correspondence to: G G P Browning
- Accepted 25 April 2000
Maternal primary hyperparathyroidism should be excluded when infants present with hypocalcaemic convulsions or tetany
Primary hyperparathyroidism is a relatively common condition, being the third most common endocrine disorder after diabetes and thyroid disease. It is most often seen in patients in their 50s and 60s,1 but it can occur in juveniles, although rarely, when the diagnosis may be delayed.2 In women of childbearing age, there is an estimated incidence of 8 per 100 000 population per year.3 Pregnant patients with primary hyperparathyroidism may be asymptomatic or have subtle symptoms such as fatigue, thirst, constipation, or transient depression. These are common complaints in the general population and pregnant patients may attribute them to pregnancy. We describe two patients, seen within one year, in whom primary hyperparathyroidism was diagnosed after convulsions in their infants. Large parathyroid adenomas were localised in both patients by using technetium sestamibi scanning, and these were surgically removed.4
Case reports
Case 1
A 33 year old multiparous woman with no major medical history delivered a girl weighing 3200 g by spontaneous vertex delivery at 39 weeks' gestation. Her first child had been born three years earlier. The baby was referred to hospital at five days of age with projectile vomiting for 12 hours. A feeding test for pyloric stenosis gave negative results. On the third day of admission the infant had a major convulsion. An infection screen gave negative results.
Routine blood tests …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012