Editorials

Obstetric interventions among private and public patients

BMJ 2000; 321 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7254.125 (Published 15 July 2000) Cite this as: BMJ 2000;321:125

High rates of operative vaginal interventions in private patients need analysis

  1. James F King, Consultant in Perinatal Epidemiology ([email protected])
  1. Department of Perinatal Medicine, Royal Women's Hospital, Carlton, 3053 Australia

    Papers p 137

    Pregnant women in Australia who give birth in private hospitals have higher rates of operative delivery (caesarean sections, forceps procedures, and vacuum extractions) than those who use public hospitals. Do they need to have more caesarean sections? In this edition of the BMJ, Roberts and colleagues (p 137) examine the risk profiles of these two populations among women having babies in New South Wales, Australia.1 They found that similar rates of women were classified as low risk (48% in private hospitals and 49% in public). Within these low risk groups, private patients were more likely to be 30–34 years old, but the proportion of women classed as being at low risk was the same in each group. The authors, therefore, reasonably argue that this counters the commonly held view that the reason for higher rates of caesarean sections in private patients in Australia is because women at higher risk of complications in pregnancy are more likely to take out private insurance for pregnancy …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe