- Nicholas Banatvala (banatvala@hq.suffolk-ha.anglox.nhs.uk), honorary medical advisera,
- Anthony B Zwi, headb
- a Medical Emergency Relief International (MERLIN), London W1M 1HW,
- b Health Policy Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT
- Correspondence to: N Banatvala, Department of Public Health, Suffolk Health, PO Box 55, Ipswich IP3 8NN
This is the first of four articles
Worldwide, millions of people are annually affected by conflict and over $2bn was spent on non-food emergency aid each year between 1991 and 1997.1 Recently, 30 million people were estimated to be internally displaced and 23 million to be refugees (seeking refuge across international borders), the vast majority of whom were fleeing conflict zones.2 More agencies than ever are working in relief activities; over 200 humanitarian agencies responded to the Rwandan genocide and population displacement.3
Populations affected by armed conflict experience severe public health consequences as a result of food insecurity, population displacement, the effects of weapons, and the collapse of basic health services. 4 5 Though most conflicts after the second world war took place in Africa, the Middle East, Asia, and Latin America, since the end of the Cold War and break up of the Soviet Union we have also witnessed conflicts in Europe and the former Soviet Union, notably in Tajikistan, Chechnya, former Yugoslavia, and Nagorno-Karabakh.6 Increasingly, with relatively few exceptions, conflicts are internal rather than waged between states.
This article argues that the evidence base for humanitarian health interventions should be actively developed and explores mechanisms for its promotion.
Summary points
Humanitarian interventions are increasingly complex and are difficult and costly to resource
Research to identify effective and efficient approaches to the delivery of aid warrants additional investment
Data on the public health effects of war and on delivery of public health in settings affected by conflict are increasingly being assembled, but the effectiveness of many humanitarian initiatives has not been adequately evaluated
Evaluation of the effectiveness of intervention in conflict settings needs to make explicit the humanitarian principles on which interventions are based
Generating knowledge and promoting an evidence based culture will require collaborative initiatives between …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The word parameter is almost always wrong.
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Television shows and education about sexually transmitted infections: no laughing matter
Published 25 May 2012
Re: David Morrell
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Time to end the distinction between mental and neurological illnesses
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Are we nearly there with tranexamic acid?
Published 25 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27