- T W Meade, director (t.w.meade{at}mds.qmw.ac.uk),
- P J Brennan, statistician the MRC General Practice Research Framework.
- Correspondence to: T Meade
- Accepted 16 March 2000
Abstract
Objective: To determine which groups of patients may derive particular benefit or experience harm from the use of low dose aspirin for the primary prevention of coronary heart disease.
Design: Randomised controlled trial.
Setting: 108 group practices in the Medical Research Council's general practice research framework who were taking part in the thrombosis prevention trial.
Participants: 5499 men aged between 45 and 69 years at entry who were at increased risk of coronary heart disease.
Main outcome measures: Myocardial infarction, coronary death, and stroke.
Results: Aspirin reduced coronary events by 20%. This benefit, mainly for non-fatal events, was significantly greater the lower the systolic blood pressure at entry (interaction P=0.0015), the relative risk at pressures 130 mm Hg being 0.55 compared with 0.94 at pressures >145 mm Hg. Aspirin also reduced strokes at low but not high pressures, the relative risks being 0.41 and 1.42 (P=0.006) respectively. The relative risk of all major cardiovascular events—that is, the sum of coronary heart disease and stroke—was 0.59 at pressures <130 mm Hg compared with 1.08 at pressures >145 mm Hg (P=0.0001).
Conclusion: Even with the limitations of subgroup analyses the evidence suggests that the benefit of low dose aspirin in primary prevention may occur mainly in those with lower systolic blood pressures, although it is not clear even in these men that the benefit outweighs the potential hazards. Men with higher pressures may be exposed to the risks of bleeding while deriving no benefit through reductions in coronary heart disease and stroke.
Footnotes
-
Funding Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, DuPont Pharma, and Bayer Corporation. GlaxoWellcome and Boehringer-Ingelheim provided warfarin free of charge during the pilot stage. DuPont Pharma provided warfarin, and Bayer Corporation provided aspirin free of charge during the main trial.
-
Competing interests DuPont Pharma and Bayer have given financial assistance with attendance at meetings and honoraria for speaking to Professor Meade and paid into a discretionary fund to supplement the unit's allocation.
- Accepted 16 March 2000
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Why the US healthcare system is failing, and what might rescue it
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Risk of cardiovascular serious adverse events associated with varenicline use for tobacco cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 16 May 2012
Most responses
What are the benefits of an early diagnosis? (8 responses)
Published 18 Apr 2012
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Streptococcus B in pregnancy: to screen or not to screen? (7 responses)
Published 18 Apr 2012 - 13:53