Training is needed in the recognition and repair of perineal trauma
- Charlotte Chaliha, specialist registrar,
- Abdul H Sultan, consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kingston Hospital, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey KT2 7QB
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mayday University Hospital, Croydon, Surrey CR7 7YE
- Academic Medical Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Amsterdam, 1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Michael's Hospital, Bristol BS2 8EG
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA
EDITOR—The finding by Signorello et al that midline episiotomy may impair anal continence is valuable and highlights the effect of perineal trauma on the anal continence mechanism.1 The authors acknowledge the limitations of the study, which was retrospective, non-randomised, and may have included misclassifications of perineal trauma.
We investigated 161 nulliparous women in the third trimester and 12 weeks post partum. A symptom questionnaire and anorectal investigations were performed at both visits and anal endosonography was performed post partum.2
Women with an intact perineum had a mean squeeze pressure of 105.8±26.4 mmHg, those who sustained second and third degree perineal tears had a mean squeeze pressure of 92.3±30.3 mmHg (P=0.022), and those who had mediolateral episiotomies had a mean squeeze pressure of 92.2±29.7 mmHg (P=0.032).
Sphincter trauma was associated with perineal trauma at delivery: of 59 women with second or third degree tears, 41 (69%) had sphincter trauma versus 39 out of 97 women (40%) with an intact perineum (P=0.001). Sphincter trauma was also significantly more common in women who underwent vaginal delivery: 58 out of 130 (45%) women had sphincter defects in the vaginal delivery group versus 1 out of 26 women (4%) women who underwent a caesarean section (P=0.0005). However, the difference between our study and that of Signorello et al is that the patients in our study had a mediolateral and not a midline episiotomy, and it …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012