Editorials

Dereliction of duty in an ageist society

BMJ 2000; 320 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7247.1422 (Published 27 May 2000) Cite this as: BMJ 2000;320:1422

The government's silence over royal commission report on long term care is ominous

  1. Iona Heath, general practitioner and member of the Royal Commission on Long Term Care
  1. Caversham Group Practice, London NW5 2UP

    The Royal Commission on Long Term Care submitted its report to parliament over a year ago.1 The recommendations have been widely supported, perhaps most notably by the parliamentary health select committee, which declared that “failure to act would be dereliction of duty” and again recently by the presidents of three royal colleges and of the British Geriatrics Society.2 Yet the government has still to respond to the principal majority recommendation that “the costs of care for those individuals who need it should be split between living costs, housing costs, and personal care. Personal care should be available after an assessment, according to need and paid for from general taxation: the rest should be subject to a co-payment according to means.”

    The royal commission was set up to examine the options for a sustainable system of funding long term care in the face of a widespread perception, particularly among older people, that the current system is unjust. With the apparently laudable aim of combining improved cost effectiveness with less care in institutions …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe