Head injuryBMJ 2000; 320 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7245.1348/a (Published 13 May 2000) Cite this as: BMJ 2000;320:1348
- Douglas Carnall (email@example.com)
A review in this week's BMJ (p 1308) concludes that the evidence for any of the treatments for head injury is thin, because the trials designed to assess potential treatments have been small or otherwise methodologically weak. The review's authors are also trialists, proud owners of the CRASH acronym (corticosteroid randomisation after significant head injury) and …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial