Patient information systems are not more expensive than leaflets

doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1212

From trainee to consultant, BMJ Group offers doctors around the world tailored information, special events, learning resources and recruitment services at every step along their career path.

... by doctors, for doctors, for patients
We are open for entries!

Online learning

BMJ Learning

High-quality CME / CPD for doctors and other healthcare professionals. BMJ Learning features hundreds of accredited, peer-reviewed learning modules in text, video, and audio formats. Find out more

Courses and Qualifications

BMJ Masterclasses

BMJ Masterclasses, led by experts, help clinicians to use the latest evidence and recent guidelines in practice and meet their CPD/CME requirements. Find out more

Exam Preparation

The leading provider of online exam preparation, helping over 167,000 healthcare professionals to pass their exams. Find out more

onExamination

Search all BMJ comment articles:

From

Limit by

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Ray Jones, senior lecturer in health informatics. (r.b.jones@udcf.gla.ac.uk),
Neil Craig, lecturer in health economics.

Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RZ

EDITOR—Graham et al, who compared a touch screen system with leaflets for providing women with information on prenatal tests,1 and Wyatt in his commentary2 may be too conservative in their conclusions. Graham et al mention the cost of developing the system and Wyatt says because there is limited evidence of benefit for these expensive tools over well designed leaflets they should be used only in the context of rigorous research studies. However, the study did not include an economic comparison of the use of the computer and leaflets. A full …