Education And Debate

How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed?

BMJ 2000; 320 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1197 (Published 29 April 2000) Cite this as: BMJ 2000;320:1197
  1. Simon G Thompson, professor ([email protected]),
  2. Julie A Barber, research fellow
  1. Department of Medical Statistics and Evaluation, Imperial College School of Medicine, London W12 0NN
  1. Correspondence to: S G Thompson, MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 2SR
  • Accepted 13 December 1999

Pragmatic randomised trials are usually large scale multicentre studies in which interventions or medical policies are compared in a realistic setting.1 The intention is that conclusions from these trials, if accepted, can be adopted directly into medical practice.2 Economic evaluations carried out alongside these trials are increasingly common because it is often important to assess costs and cost effectiveness as well as clinical outcomes.3 Costs are usually derived from information about the quantity of healthcare resources used by each patient in the trial. The quantities of each resource used are multiplied by fixed unit cost values and are then summed over the separate types of resource to give a total cost per patient.4

Distribution of costs from a trial comparing endometrial resection with hysterectomy in women with menorrhagia. Costs are based on health resource use from randomisation to two years; they include preoperative, operative, hospital stay, complications, retreatment, and primary care components5

This information leads to a range of different costs across participants in the trial. As an example, the figure shows the distribution of costs in women with menorrhagia randomised to treatment with endometrial resection or abdominal hysterectomy.5 Such highly skewed distributions are typical of cost data; the long right hand tail reflects the fact that some patients incur high costs because of factors such as medical complications, reoperation, or extended hospital stay.

Summary points

Health economic evaluations are now commonly included in pragmatic clinical trials that inform policy decisions

Despite the usual skewness in the distribution of costs, it is the arithmetic mean that is the most informative measure

Measures other than the arithmetic mean do not provide information about the cost of treating all patients, which is needed as the basis for healthcare policy decisions

Statistical analysis based on transforming cost data or …

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Free trial

Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial

Subscribe