Education and debate

Epidemiology of medical error

BMJ 2000; 320 doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.774 (Published 18 March 2000)
Cite this as: BMJ 2000;320:774

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. N Saul Weingart (sweingar@caregroup.harvard.edu), associate physiciana,
  2. Ross McL Wilson, senior specialist intensive careb,
  3. Robert W Gibberd, associate professorc,
  4. Bernadette Harrison, managerb
  1. a Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA
  2. b Quality Assurance Royal North Shore, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW 2065 Australia
  3. c Department of Statistics, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308 Australia
  1. Correspondence to: S N Weingart

    Newspaper and television stories of catastrophic injuries occurring at the hands of clinicians spotlight the problem of medical error but provide little insight into its nature or magnitude.1 Clinicians, patients, and policymakers may underestimate the magnitude of risk and the extent of harm. We review the epidemiology of medical error, concentrating primarily on the prevalence and consequences of error, which types are most common, which clinicians make errors, and the risk factors that increase the likelihood of injury from error.

    Summary points

    The Harvard and Australian studies into medical error remain the only studies that provide population level data on the rates of injuries to patients in hospitals and they identified a substantial amount of medical error

    In the United States medical error results in 44 000–98 000 unnecessary deaths each year and 1 000 000 excess injuries

    Errors often occur when clinicians are inexperienced and new procedures are introduced

    Extremes of age, complex care, urgent care, and a prolonged hospital stay are associated with more errors

    Prevalence and consequences in hospitals

    Benchmark studies

    The Harvard study of medical practice is the benchmark for estimating the extent of medical injuries occurring in hospitals. Brennan et al reviewed the medical charts of 30 121 patients admitted to 51 acute care hospitals in New York statein 1984.2 They reported that adverse events—injuries caused by medical management that prolonged admission or produced disability at the time of discharge—occurred in 3.7% of admissions. A subsequent analysis of the same data found that 69% of injuries were caused by errors.3

    In a study of the quality of Australian health care, a population based study modelled on the Harvard study, investigators reviewed the medical records of 14 179 admissions to 28 hospitals in New South Wales and South Australia in 1995.4 An adverse event occurred in 16.6% of admissions, resulting in …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    BMJ most popular