- Thomas W Nolan (TNolan@apiweb.org), statistician
- Associates in Process Improvement, 1110 Bonifant Street, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
The automated teller machine that dispenses cash and other banking transactions has become ubiquitous in many parts of the world. Most machines follow one of two sequences to complete a transaction. Some dispense the money first and then return the card. Others reverse these two steps. Since the aim of the transaction is to obtain the money, common sense and research in human factors predict that the person using the machine is more likely to forget the card if it is returned after the money is dispensed.1 The order is designed into the system and produces a predictable risk of error.
Researchers have documented the extent of errors and their effect on patient safety. 2 3 Like the card forgotten at the automated teller machine, many of the adverse events resulted from an error made by a person who was capable of performing the task safely, had done so many times in the past, and faced significant personal consequences for the error. Although we cannot change the aspects of human cognition that cause us to err, we can design systems that reduce error and make them safer for patients.4 My aim here is to outline an approach to designing safe systems of care based on the work of human factors experts and reliability engineers.
Summary points
Many errors are attributable to characteristics of human cognition, and their risk is predictable
Systems can be designed to help prevent errors, to make them detectable so they can be intercepted, and to provide means of mitigation if they are not intercepted
Tactics to reduce errors and mitigate their adverse effects include reducing complexity, optimising information processing, using automation and constraints, and mitigating unwanted effects of change
Strategies for the design of safe systems of care
Designers of systems of care can make them safer by attending to three tasks: designing the system …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Double Effect and Assisted Dying
Published 7 February 2012
Re: The NHS is heading down a hole—should we stop digging?
Published 7 February 2012
Opposing everything, everyone, every time is not constructive.
Published 7 February 2012
Physical activity versus exercise in cancer survivors: it is a matter of definition!
Published 7 February 2012
Re: Sir Karl Popper, swans, and the general practitioner
Published 7 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Wakefield sues BMJ over MMR articles (5 responses)
Published 10 Jan 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (5 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012