This article has a correction
Please see: Prediction of survival for preterm births
Survival table was not easy to understand
- T H H G Koh, neonatologist,
- H Harrison, mother of a child born at 28 weeks,
- A Casey, mother of a baby born at 27 weeks
- Kirwan Hospital, Thuringowa, Queensland 4817, Australia
- 1144 Sterling Avenue, Berkeley CA 94708, USA
- Seaholme, Victoria 3018, Australia
- Department of Feto-Maternal Medicine, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX
- Department of Child Health and Obstetrics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
- Division of Newborn Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia
- Victorian Perinatal Data Collection Unit, Department of Human Services, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia
EDITOR—The article by Draper et al deserves further comment.1 The objective of the study was to produce current data on survival of preterm infants, yet theirs was a retrospective study for 1994-7. Since it is now 1999 we believe that their data, albeit useful, are recent rather than current. Antenatal administration of steroids to the mothers was not mentioned as one of the additional factors affecting infants' survival.
As a neonatologist and two mothers of extremely premature babies we do not find the tables described in the paper easy to understand. Draper et al may be interested in our paper published last month, which describes a table giving outcome for parents of babies at less than 28 weeks of gestation.2 This table contains information on survival rates, and also short term complications and treatment of the most recent cohort of such babies. This table could be unit based, updated annually, and be made available to the parents and each member of the perinatal team to promote consistency in the information given to the parents. We also suggest that parents be informed of 11 points, four of which …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012