- Helen Bedford, senior research fellowa,
- David Elliman, consultant in community child health (DavidElliman@compuserve.com)b
- a Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH
- b Department of Child Health, St George's Hospital, London SW17 0QT
- Correspondence to: D Elliman
Immunisation against infectious disease has probably saved more lives than any other public health intervention, apart from the provision of clean water.1 Although other factors were important, it would not have been possible to eradicate smallpox without vaccination; the eradication of wild polio from the western hemisphere is largely due to immunisation; and the immense reductions in Haemophilus influenzae type b infections, diphtheria, whooping cough, and measles are also evidence of the value of immunisation.
Despite, or perhaps because of, the success of the immunisation programme in the United Kingdom a vocal minority of parents have cast doubt on the wisdom of having their children immunised, particularly with the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine.2 Not only does this place their own children at risk, but if a significant number of children remain unimmunised it poses a risk to the general population.3 In this article we suggest how health professionals, particularly those within the primary healthcare team, can respond to parents' concerns.
Summary points
Immunisation has saved millions of lives
The routine vaccines are safe
The eradication of diseases preventable by vaccines throws undue prominence on unconfirmed adverse reactions
Vaccine scares are common
Parental concerns should be taken seriously
Health professionals have a duty to provide accurate information to enable parents to make a truly informed decision about their child's vaccinations
Methods
Our approach is based on a number of surveys showing the reasons for non-immunisation,4 5 books,2 6 articles written by those antagonistic to vaccination,7 8 and personal experience of talking to thousands of parents. Information used to respond to parental concerns (box 1) is based on extensive knowledge of both “mainstream” and “fringe” literature.
Box 1 :Parental objections to immunisation and response to these objections
The disease is not serious
Measles can kill healthy children.
The disease is uncommon
Diseases such as measles, diphtheria, and polio are common in unimmunised populations and are easily spread worldwide. …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012