Editorial

Sore throats and antibiotics

BMJ 2000; 320 doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7228.130 (Published 15 January 2000)
Cite this as: BMJ 2000;320:130

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Applying evidence on small effects is hard; variations are probably inevitable

  1. Chris Del Mar (c.delmar@mailbox.uq.edu.au), professor of general practice
  1. Centre for General Practice, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia

    General practice p 150

    The liberal use of antibiotics for sore throats is increasingly frowned on.1 There are three reasons why a clinician might use antibiotics for sore throat: to reduce the risk of complications, to shorten (or reduce the severity of) symptoms, and because of factors related to the consultation (perceived patient demand, ways of terminating the consultation, and so on). Nearly 30 years ago Howie showed a huge variation in different general practitioners' use of antibiotics for sore throat.2 Have general practitioners been thirsting for information on which to base their management? The notion that summarising evidence about an area of care will result in a sort of regulation of doctors' management appears to be naive. A Cochrane review summarising the advantages of antibiotics for sore throat has been available for several years.3 But there is nothing to suggest that there is less variation in practice. General …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    BMJ most popular