Editorials

Sore throats and antibiotics

BMJ 2000; 320 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7228.130 (Published 15 January 2000) Cite this as: BMJ 2000;320:130

Applying evidence on small effects is hard; variations are probably inevitable

  1. Chris Del Mar (c.delmar@mailbox.uq.edu.au), professor of general practice
  1. Centre for General Practice, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia

    General practice p 150

    The liberal use of antibiotics for sore throats is increasingly frowned on.1 There are three reasons why a clinician might use antibiotics for sore throat: to reduce the risk of complications, to shorten (or reduce the severity of) symptoms, and because of factors related to the consultation (perceived patient demand, ways of terminating the consultation, and so on). Nearly 30 years ago Howie showed a huge variation in different general practitioners' use of antibiotics for sore throat.2 Have general practitioners been thirsting for information on which to base their management? The notion that summarising evidence about an area of care will result in a sort of regulation of doctors' management appears to be naive. A Cochrane review summarising the advantages of antibiotics for sore throat has been available for several years.3 But there is nothing to suggest that there is less variation in practice. General …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe