- Janice Hopkins Tanne, freelance journalist
- New York
American Museum of Natural History, New York, until 29 May 2000
(see www.amnh.org/exhibitions/bodyart and www.discovery.com/exp/humancanvas/humancanvas.html)
Every time you shave, put on make up, or squeeze into tight jeans in an attempt to alter your appearance you are unwittingly following in the footsteps of your ancestors, who devised equally ingenious ways of doing the same thing. Now a history of our ancestors' methods of painting and piercing their bodies over the past 30 000 years is on display in a wondrous, imaginative, and sometimes frightening exhibition at the American Museum of Natural History. “There is no known culture in which people don't do this, whether permanently or temporarily,” said Ellen V Futter, president of the museum.
Why do people alter their bodies, sometimes painfully and permanently? Enid Schildkrout, curator of the show and chair of the museum's division of anthropology, thinks there are many reasons: “To be human. For beauty, as a sign of change or rebellion or conformity, to show status, to mark a moment, to be able to wear a certain ornament, to identify with spirits or ancestors or deities, to show group membership, to show gender distinctions.”
Organised in six major …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Should UK membership exams be held overseas? Yes
Published 9 February 2012
Why not use ultrasound for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer for both the exclusion criteria for recruitment and for diagnosis as outcome variable
Published 9 February 2012
Re: Can the severity of menopausal symptoms be predicted?
Published 9 February 2012
Re: Does the BMJ have a particular ideology to pursue in assisted dying?
Published 9 February 2012
Re: Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 9 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Wakefield sues BMJ over MMR articles (5 responses)
Published 10 Jan 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012