Good employment practice considers how well someone does the job rather than who they might happen to be. Ageism is arguably the last form of irrational prejudice to be exposed to scrutiny. According to one survey, about one in 10 employers still believes that workers over 30 are over the hill, and one quarter would not employ a 50 year old. The government has backed away from outlawing discrimination on grounds of age alone, however; instead, there is a voluntary code of practice. The code predictably presses for merit and competence to inform decisions in recruitment, training and redundancy rather than age. The guidance is silent on perhaps the most deeply ingrained ageism of them all: the compulsory retirement age. The pressure to change this as the population ages seems likely to increase. Sargeant M. Age discrimination in employment. London: Institute of Employment, 1999.







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27