This article has a correction
Please see: The price of coffins: specious arguments by eminent doctors against the dangers of tobacco
- P Cowen, retired senior lecturer
- 22 Congreve Way, Bardsey, Leeds LS17 9BG
One does not avert death by ignoring the price of coffins.
Ernest Bramah, Kailung Unrolled His Mat
In June 1957 the BBC radio news reported on a white paper, prepared by Doll and Hill, which had been presented to parliament.1 The paper claimed that cigarette smoking appreciably increased a person's risk of developing lung cancer, with the incidence increasing in proportion to the number of cigarettes smoked. This news was published in a statement by the Medical Research Council,2 which referred to Doll and Hill's findings published in the BMJ and the Lancet. The minister of health at the time was asked in parliament what he intended to do about the findings His response was “nothing” (which was the case) and that it was up to the medical officers of health to act on this information as they saw fit.
Summary points
Good evidence shows that smoking causes lung cancer
The media's response to this information was initially resistant
Specious arguments were used to detract from the real issue, which confused the general public and lessened its concern
After 40 years there has been little change in smoking rates
Responses to the white paper
Having smoked over 20 cigarettes a day for 11 years I was alarmed by this information and decided to stop immediately; I have not smoked since. Shortly after quitting I began to take an interest in the response to the white paper and was surprised by what I found. In general, newspaper articles reflected resistance to the findings—for example, the chairman of the Tobacco Workers Trade Union was reported in the tabloid press about 1960 as saying that cigarettes alone could not be blamed for lung cancer as no …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Evidence Based Medicine-Boondoggle?
Published 8 February 2012
Wills and wishes in organ donation
Published 8 February 2012
Re: Lessons from America
Published 8 February 2012
Boosting the role of low-molecular-weight heparins in primary PCI
Published 8 February 2012
Re: Should UK membership exams be held overseas? Yes
Published 8 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Wakefield sues BMJ over MMR articles (5 responses)
Published 10 Jan 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (5 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012