Abstract
Objective: To investigate the risks of the sudden infant death syndrome and factors that may contribute to unsafe sleeping environments.
Design: Three year, population based case-control study. Parental interviews were conducted for each sudden infant death and for four controls matched for age, locality, and time of sleep.
Setting: Five regions in England with a total population of over 17 million people.
Subjects: 325 babies who died and 1300 control infants.
Results: In the multivariate analysis infants who shared their parents' bed and were then put back in their own cot had no increased risk (odds ratio 0.67; 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 2.00). There was an increased risk for infants who shared the bed for the whole sleep or were taken to and found in the parental bed (9.78; 4.02 to 23.83), infants who slept in a separate room from their parents (10.49; 4.26 to 25.81), and infants who shared a sofa (48.99; 5.04 to 475.60) The risk associated with being found in the parental bed was not significant for older infants (>14 weeks) or for infants of parents who did not smoke and became non-significant after adjustment for recent maternal alcohol consumption (>2 units), use of duvets (>4 togs), parental tiredness (infant slept ≤4 hours for longest sleep in previous 24 hours), and overcrowded housing conditions (>2 people per room of the house).
Conclusions: There are certain circumstances when bed sharing should be avoided, particularly for infants under four months old. Parents sleeping on a sofa with infants should always be avoided. There is no evidence that bed sharing is hazardous for infants of parents who do not smoke.
Key messsages
Cosleeping with an infant on a sofa was associated with a particularly high risk of sudden infant death syndrome
Sharing a room with the parents was associated with a lower risk
There was no increased risk associated with bed sharing when the infant was placed back in his or her cot
Among parents who do not smoke or infants older than 14 weeks there was no association between infants being found in the parental bed and an increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome
The risk linked with bed sharing among younger infants seems to be associated with recent parental consumption of alcohol, overcrowded housing conditions, extreme parental tiredness, and the infant being under a duvet
Babies sleeping with parents: case-control study of factors influencing the risk of the sudden infant death syndrome
- Peter S Blair, medical statistician (p.s.blair{at}bris.ac.uk)a,
- Peter J Fleming, professor of infant health and developmental physiologya,
- Iain J Smith, senior lecturer in health research and honorary consultant in child healthb,
- Martin Ward Platt, consultant paediatrician and senior lecturer in child healthc,
- Jeanine Young, research nursea,
- Pam Nadin, research health visitora,
- P J Berry, professor of paediatric pathologya,
- Jean Golding, professor of paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, the CESDI SUDI research groupa
- a Institute of Child Health, Royal Hospital for Children, St Michael's Hill, Bristol BS2 8BJ
- b Nuffield Institute for Health Services, Leeds LS2 9PL
- c Newcastle Neonatal Service, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Postbag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
- Correspondence to: P Blair
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the risks of the sudden infant death syndrome and factors that may contribute to unsafe sleeping environments.
Design: Three year, population based case-control study. Parental interviews were conducted for each sudden infant death and for four controls matched for age, locality, and time of sleep.
Setting: Five regions in England with a total population of over 17 million people.
Subjects: 325 babies who died and 1300 control infants.
Results: In the multivariate analysis infants who shared their parents' bed and were then put back in their own cot had no increased risk (odds ratio 0.67; 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 2.00). There was an increased risk for infants who shared the bed for the whole sleep or were taken to and found in the parental bed (9.78; 4.02 to 23.83), infants who slept in a separate room from their parents (10.49; 4.26 to 25.81), and infants who shared a sofa (48.99; 5.04 to 475.60) The risk associated with being found in the parental bed was not significant for older infants (>14 weeks) or for infants of parents who did not smoke and became non-significant after adjustment for recent maternal alcohol consumption (>2 units), use of duvets (>4 togs), parental tiredness (infant slept ≤4 hours for longest sleep in previous 24 hours), and overcrowded housing conditions (>2 people per room of the house).
Conclusions: There are certain circumstances when bed sharing should be avoided, particularly for infants under four months old. Parents sleeping on a sofa with infants should always be avoided. There is no evidence that bed sharing is hazardous for infants of parents who do not smoke.
Key messsages
Cosleeping with an infant on a sofa was associated with a particularly high risk of sudden infant death syndrome
Sharing a room with the parents was associated with a lower risk
There was no increased risk associated with bed sharing when the infant was placed back in his or her cot
Among parents who do not smoke or infants older than 14 weeks there was no association between infants being found in the parental bed and an increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome
The risk linked with bed sharing among younger infants seems to be associated with recent parental consumption of alcohol, overcrowded housing conditions, extreme parental tiredness, and the infant being under a duvet
Commentary: Cot death—the story so far
- Ed Mitchell (ed.mitchell{at}auckland.ac.nz), associate professor in paediatrics
- a Institute of Child Health, Royal Hospital for Children, St Michael's Hill, Bristol BS2 8BJ
- b Nuffield Institute for Health Services, Leeds LS2 9PL
- c Newcastle Neonatal Service, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Postbag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Why the US healthcare system is failing, and what might rescue it
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Risk of cardiovascular serious adverse events associated with varenicline use for tobacco cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 16 May 2012
Most responses
What are the benefits of an early diagnosis? (8 responses)
Published 18 Apr 2012
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Streptococcus B in pregnancy: to screen or not to screen? (7 responses)
Published 18 Apr 2012 - 13:53