- Egon Jonsson, director (management@sbu.se)a,
- David Banta, senior researcherb
- a Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Tyrgatan 7, Box 5650, 114 86 Stockholm, Sweden
- b TNO Prevention and Health, Public Health, PO Box 2215, 2301 CE Leiden, Netherlands
- Correspondence to: E Jonsson
Technology means applied science. Health technology is defined as the drugs, devices, and medical and surgical procedures used in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of disease.1
Many countries regulate pharmaceuticals and medical devices and equipment by law. This legislation concerns safety and efficacy—that is, that the risk of a technology is acceptable and that it actually does what it is supposed to do. For all other technologies, such as medical and surgical procedures, there are generally no regulations.
Summary points
Health technology includes not only equipment, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices but also surgical and medical procedures
Most countries regulate drugs and devices by law, by payment, or by placement of services—a new, multidisciplinary research called health technology assessment assists policy makers on matters of the medical, economic, social, and ethical implications of the dissemination and use of health technology
Health technology assessment synthesises the findings from clinical research and includes analysis of costs, cost effectiveness, and broader social aspects of health technology
Most countries in the European Union have established agencies for health technology assessment to provide evidence based information to health policymakers
The development of a variety of health technologies, including effective diagnostic devices (for example, radiography, computed tomography), effective pharmaceuticals (for example, antibiotics), and other interventions, represents major improvements in the history of medicine—not long ago there was little to offer patients in the way of effective health care. Until recently almost any health technology was welcome both for scientific achievements and as potential solutions to diseases.2 Many technologies, however, have not turned out to be important advances. On the contrary, some have the potential for doing more harm than good—for example, mass screening for prostate cancer and all the treatments used to immobilise patients with back pain.3
The rapid development of new and costly, although …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012