- Egon Jonsson, director (management@sbu.se)a,
- David Banta, senior researcherb
- a Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Tyrgatan 7, Box 5650, 114 86 Stockholm, Sweden
- b TNO Prevention and Health, Public Health, PO Box 2215, 2301 CE Leiden, Netherlands
- Correspondence to: E Jonsson
Technology means applied science. Health technology is defined as the drugs, devices, and medical and surgical procedures used in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of disease.1
Many countries regulate pharmaceuticals and medical devices and equipment by law. This legislation concerns safety and efficacy—that is, that the risk of a technology is acceptable and that it actually does what it is supposed to do. For all other technologies, such as medical and surgical procedures, there are generally no regulations.
Summary points
Health technology includes not only equipment, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices but also surgical and medical procedures
Most countries regulate drugs and devices by law, by payment, or by placement of services—a new, multidisciplinary research called health technology assessment assists policy makers on matters of the medical, economic, social, and ethical implications of the dissemination and use of health technology
Health technology assessment synthesises the findings from clinical research and includes analysis of costs, cost effectiveness, and broader social aspects of health technology
Most countries in the European Union have established agencies for health technology assessment to provide evidence based information to health policymakers
The development of a variety of health technologies, including effective diagnostic devices (for example, radiography, computed tomography), effective pharmaceuticals (for example, antibiotics), and other interventions, represents major improvements in the history of medicine—not long ago there was little to offer patients in the way of effective health care. Until recently almost any health technology was welcome both for scientific achievements and as potential solutions to diseases.2 Many technologies, however, have not turned out to be important advances. On the contrary, some have the potential for doing more harm than good—for example, mass screening for prostate cancer and all the treatments used to immobilise patients with back pain.3
The rapid development of new and costly, although …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27